Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom O.'s avatar

For me, it comes down to unforced errors. I want to be very careful here because some of what I say may seem like a paradox. (If you don't like long reads, just move on)

I believe Robitaille is an excellent steward of the Kings brand, yet I blame Luc more than the players for the failure.

I believe the players were good enough to beat the Oilers, and yet I believe Rob Blake is more to blame than the players for the failure.

I believe Hiller showed signs of being a winner all season with some of his decisions, yet I blame Hiller more than the players for the failure.

A organization takes on the characteristics of its leaders.

Robitaille had a limited set of skills as a player and overcame them when surrounded by strong, decisive, versatile and highly skilled legends. Don't get me wrong, I understand that Luc is in the HOF and deservedly so, but he was neither mastermind nor grit, neither hitter nor speed threat. He was reliable in a limited role in an entirely different era of hockey.

Robitaille did not drive the Kings to ultimate victory as a player, and in his Cup win at Detroit he was a depth player behind Brett Hull, Yzerman, Federov, Shanahan, Larionov, Datsyuk. His deficiencies defensively were covered by the likes of Lidstrom, Chelios, Draper, Olausson, Jiri Fischer, Maltby, McCarty and a goalie named Hasek.

Robitaille was the 7th highest scoring Red Wing forward in the playoffs and the 8th forward in minutes played. He was a contributor, he was a teammate, but he was not a leader and not a star player among that group. He was successful in limited deployment among one of the best teams ever assembled, a team that was great before him and after his time there.

As a Kings executive, Robitaille has surrounded himself with sycophants; players from his playing era and not people that were successful elsewhere and brought into the organization. He hires friends and hopes they fit into roles, he does not hire experts with proven track records. Perpetuating "culture" has been an excuse for filling crucial roles from among the limited talent pool of former Kings. Every former player hired has been a "learn on the job" type, not an independent thinker with a successful method allowed to run their own shop.

Blake is an example; promoted from within, next in line, a big name player whose only independent executive experience was guiding a 2014 Canadian National Team that failed to medal for only the 2nd time since 1981. Would Rob Blake be in demand from other teams as a GM if his tenure ended today?

Hiller is an example, too. Next in line, hired from within, a new head coach with no track record who was then surrounded by D.J. Smith and Newell Brown. Smith has never won a playoff series as either an assistant coach or as a head coach. Newell Brown was in charge of the 27th best Power Play this season, down from 12th. Most of the season, the Kings were 30th.

Blake put together a better team than last year. So what? Blake has had 8 years and zero playoff series wins.

Hiller ran his guys into the ground, failed to build trust in the depth players, and destroyed the recipe by leaving out key ingredients and overcooking it. He played 11/7, then 12/6, and in what is known as the toughest grind among all sports playoffs he abandoned the guys he was supposed to have spent the season getting ready and played 9/5.

Fatigue breeds mistakes and injuries; we saw a series where the Kings were rarely physical (who can blame them?) and where mental mistakes (Byfield's non-clear, Fiala shooting early at the empty net and missing) cost us games.

Back that up with a preposterous challenge on Kane's goal but not on an earlier goal that same game where there was actual contact from Corey Perry as Kuemper tried to play the puck. Neither call was going to go the Kings' way in Edmonton in a million years; as evidence I give you the Edmundson trip which would have negated any Byfield misplay.

Luc hired these people; the organization has become inbred, is guided by group-think, and harbors mediocrity in the name of culture and loyalty. It is guided by former players and coaches, most of whom never won, but all of whom were Luc's friends.

There is no team of independent, expert rivals to examine decisions; there is entitlement based on social status. There is no accountability based on merit and results; there is perpetuation of a per diem crowd vicariously "staying in the game."

It is one thing to preserve legacy, and reward significant members from team history. It is a sad thing to hire from among them only, to the exclusion of outside ability, fresh thinking, past success and independent vision.

The Kings players played their guts out, I love those guys, every one of them. Ultimately they lost a mental game being let down at crucial moments by bewildering decision making and over-use. Even our valiant lions of the ice could not overcome the extra weight of organizational baggage forced upon them, needlessly.

The players did exactly what they were told to do, and that is why they lost.

Expand full comment
Yvette Brown's avatar

You crushed it, Helene. You had me at “Marty McSorley moment”

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts